|
He would like to get some money out of her but the calf
is of paramount importance to him.
How will you deal with this situation?
Will you acquiesce to his request to keep her alive for
two weeks until she calves?
Are there alternatives that might be morally correct for
the cow?
GENETIC ENGINEERING OF
FOOD
Sally Mackenzie, Peter Muriana, Bernie Tao, and Mark
Volkmann
INTRODUCTION:
Our group began by discussing the personal, social, and
ethical impact of genetic engineering technology on food
production. We talked about how a number of our students
object to genetic engineering on the basis of what they
perceive to be a conflict with the natural order established
by God. As we continued our discussion, we generated other
reasons that students (and others) resist purchasing and
eating genetically engineered food. Our discussion helped us
to identify problems, issues, and concerns regarding ties
topic. We believe the activity we have generated will result
in the same kind of discussion for our students that we have
had. The purpose of this lesson is to help students use
their strong feelings about genetic engineering to develop a
deeper understanding of its scientific and ethical
attributes in food production.
PEDAGOGICAL GOALS:
1. Help students elicit any personal/unspoken concerns
about the purchase and consumption of genetically engineered
foods.
|
2. To help students develop ethical/logical arguments to
either substantiate or question their beliefs.
ACTIVITY (2-3 CLASS PERIODS):
1. Provide the following agricultural products in two
forms--genetically engineered and ungenetically engineered:
tomatoes, milk, and cotton (we know this is not a food).
2. Invite students to try a slice of tomato from each
dish, taste the milk from both glasses, and wear the samples
of cotton cloth. [Our group did not reach agreement as
to whether we would tell the students what they were
sampling. Some felt the students should be told which was
genetically engineered before they tasted it, while others
felt thev should not be told until after they had eaten
it.]
3. Ask students to write what they felt before, during,
and after they had eaten the food. Do not tell the students
to make an argument at this point. It is important that they
state their feelings as clearly and in as much detail as
possible.
4. Form small groups of three to four students each and
ask them to share what they wrote. After sharing, ask them
to make a list of the problems they experienced and to
explain why they felt that way.
5. Collect and read the students problems (to
yourself--not out loud in class). [Our intention is that
by reading the students' objections, the professor will be
better able to provide a response that addresses some of
their concerns. Additionally, we hope that students will be
more inclined to find the response personally
meaningful.]
6. Through lecture, reading, or video, provide
information that describes the science of genetic
engineering, as it pertains to food production and to the
students' statements.
|
This information should deal with the chemical and
genetic similarity between the food that has been engineered
and the same type of food that has not. [Our intention
is to develop a basis for the next day's activity where
students will be asked to consider whether to label
genetically engineered foods.]
Assign students an appropriate reading on how to make a
logical argument. Review what constitutes an ethical
argument and provide some exercises in doing so.
THE ETHICAL PROBLEM:
1 . Place students in the same small groups (see #4
above) and ask them to develop a moral argument relative to
the following statement: We are morally obligated to label
all food substances that are genetically engineered.
A. Food is intimate (we ingest it and it becomes part of
who we are).
B. Since food is intimate, the public has a right
to know the contents and production processes of the food
they purchase and consume. C. Food producers have a moral
obligation to label all genetically engineered food.
Or
A. Genetically engineered foods are no different in
chemical contents than nongenetically engineered food.
B. Since there is no difference between genetically
engineered and non-genetically engineered foods, the public
has no compelling need to know which foods are and are not
genetically engineered.
Genetic
Food Continued...
|